Discussion about this post

User's avatar
bob's avatar

Maybe I'm not sufficiently thorough in perusing editorial cartoons, but it seems to me that there are a lot of "artists" who "avoid controversy and produce a bunch of bland cartoons" - they may be boring and losing readers, but it seems the newspapers keep publishing the cartoons because the newspapers themselves do no want to risk losing subscribers.

Also, your comment on 15-year-old umpires reminded me of a time I got "drafted" to be first base umpire for a Little League game (one of the teams for which I had last played only 2 years earlier). There was a guy on 1st, and the first baseman was my best friend's younger brother (also my former teammate). The runner took off early, and I threw whatever piece of laundry they'd given me, but no one saw that as they were watching the runner... and said runner actually scored due to the overthrows/missed catches that so often happen in that age group. When I made the kid come back to 1st base, it was kind of like today's political climate: half the parents thought I was an exceptional umpire while the other half felt I was as blind as a bat and the scum of the earth.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

The La Jolla socialite publisher is Helen Copley, correct? She was hired at the San Diego Union as Mr. Copley's secretary and worked her way up to the top by marrying the boss. That's quite a painful memory, no doubt, being fired for a cartoon of non-Republican messaging.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts